Tinnitus Retraining Therapy (TRT) for tinnitus.
From: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;3:CD007330
Tinnitus is described as the perception of sound or noise in the absence of real acoustic stimulation. Although an outright cure for tinnitus remains elusive, various management strategies have been developed to help to lessen the impact of the symptom. Following the publication of a neurophysiological model of tinnitus, Tinnitus Retraining Therapy was developed. Using a combination of directive counselling and sound therapy in a strict framework, this is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for tinnitus. Many studies refer to the use of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy where in fact a modified version of this therapy is actually being implemented. It is therefore important to confirm the use of authentic Tinnitus Retraining Therapy when reviewing any study that reports its use.
To assess the efficacy of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy in the treatment of tinnitus, the search included the Cochrane ENT Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, EMBASE and reference lists of identified publications. The date of the most recent search was 26 August 2009. Randomised controlled trials of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy versus no treatment, or other forms of treatment, in adult patients with tinnitus were selected. Both authors critically appraised the retrieved studies for risk of bias and extracted data independently. Where necessary, we contacted the original study authors for further information.
Only one trial (123 participants) was included in the review. Several excluded trials did not follow the strict protocol for Tinnitus Retraining Therapy, evaluating instead a modified form of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy. The included trial showed Tinnitus Retraining Therapy to be more effective than a tinnitus masking approach. In this study outcome data for tinnitus severity were presented using three instruments (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, Tinnitus Severity Index) for patients in three groups (participants’ tinnitus being a ‘moderate problem’, big problem’ or ‘very big problem’).
At 18 months, improvements for the three groups in the three scores (Tinnitus Retraining Therapy versus Tinnitus Masking) were respectively: ‘moderate problem’ – Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: 18.2 versus 4.6, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire: 489 versus 178, Tinnitus Severity Index 7.5 versus 1.6; ‘big problem’ – Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: 29.2 versus 16.7, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire: 799 versus 256, Tinnitus Severity Index: 12.1 versus 6.7; and ‘very big problem’ – Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: 50.4 versus 10.3, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire; 1118 versus 300, Tinnitus Severity Index: 19.7 versus 4.8.
A single, low-quality randomised controlled trial suggests that Tinnitus Retraining Therapy is much more effective as a treatment for patients with tinnitus than tinnitus masking.
Related Sources:
Tinnitus retraining therapy: implementing the neurophysiological model |
Guide to conducting tinnitus retraining therapy initial and follow-up interviews | Tinnitus Retraining Therapy | The TRT method in practice