Low back pain and neck pain as predictors of sickness absence among municipal employees
From: Scand J Public Health. 2012 Feb 3. [Epub ahead of print]
To study whether having ever had local low back pain, sciatica, neck pain, or some combination of low back pain and neck pain, predicts sickness absence among municipal employees. The study sample (n=6911, 80% women, response rate 67%) included employees of the City of Helsinki who reached the age of 40, 45, 50, 55, or 60 years between 2000-02. Survey data on pain, working conditions, and health behaviours were linked to register data on sickness absence for three subsequent years. Sickness absence was categorised as self-certified (lasting for 1-3 days) and medically certified (lasting for 4 days or more) and the number of spells during the follow up was analysed using Poisson regression analysis.
In women, medically certified sickness absence was predicted by sciatica, neck pain and the combination of sciatica and neck pain, allowing for working conditions, body mass index, and smoking. Local low back pain did not predict medically certified sickness absence. Self-certified sickness absence was modestly predicted by all pain categories and by neck pain alone and with local low back pain or sciatica in men.
Medically certified sickness absence was predicted by sciatica and neck pain, but not by local low back pain. The association was accentuated in those with both sciatica and neck pain. Pain combinations may have a stronger effect on work ability than pain in one location.
Triggers for an episode of sudden onset low back pain: study protocol.
From: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Jan 24;13(1):7.
Nearly 4 million people in Australia suffer from back pain at any one time, with total treatment costs exceeding $1 billion a year. In the US, the figure is an astonishing US$32 billion a year. Back complaints are the seventh most common condition in patients consulting general practitioners in Australia, and the most common musculoskeletal condition. It is also the most common health problem for which an imaging test is ordered by a general practitioner.
A potential solution to managing the problem of low back pain is the identification and control of modifiable risk factors. This approach is appealing and seemingly logical and there are notable examples where such an approach has provided major improvements in public health. For back pain this approach has not yet been fruitful: Cochrane reviews of workplace interventions, insoles and lumbar supports have failed to support these traditional back pain prevention approaches. Prevention strategies have to date been largely based on controlling long-term exposure to risk factors, for example, modifying seats to control vibration in truck drivers. However it is likely that the full potential of prevention will not be reached unless we also consider commonly occurring, modifiable risk factors that happen just before the onset of back pain. In this regard the authors see this proposed research as complementary to, rather than in conflict with, research evaluating long term risk factors.
The existence of short term risk factors or ‘triggers’ is consistent with the time course of back pain. It is well established that most people will experience low back pain in their lifetime, that pain is typically recurrent and that episodes are usually of sudden onset. For example research conducted by this group demonstrated that in an inception cohort of 969 subjects, 82% reported that their onset of low back pain was sudden. This pattern of low back pain suggests that rather than solely looking at long term exposure to risk factors it would be instructive to also look closely at events occurring immediately prior to the episode to identify modifiable triggers to the episode. This information is routinely sought by health practitioners when a patient with low back pain seeks care. The treating clinician commonly asks the patient what activity they were performing just prior to the onset of pain, in essence, “was the episode triggered by something unusual that happened just before?” The scientific method best suited to answer this question is the case-crossover design.
The authors will use the case-crossover design to provide the first accurate estimates of the transient increase in risk of low back pain associated with transient exposure to various triggers. It is possible that they will identify several factors that are not modifiable but this information will be extremely important to our understanding and explanation of the causes of low back pain.
Differences in end range lumbar flexion during slumped sitting and forward bending between low back pain subgroups and genders
From: Man Ther. 2012 Jan 17. [Epub ahead of print]
Low back pain may be related to patterns of lumbar postures and movements used to perform different tasks, but it is unclear which patterns with which tasks contribute to low back pain. For example, increases in both lumbar flexion and extension have been linked to low back pain. Some studies have reported increased lumbar flexion in people with low back pain during activities involving flexion, such as golfing and cycling. Other studies have reported that increased lumbar extension is associated with low back pain during sitting. Inconsistent findings regarding the direction of increased lumbar movement or the presence of flexed versus extended postural alignment potentially associated with low back pain may be due to the inclusion of subjects with widely varying movement patterns in a single low back pain group. Several researchers have proposed that there are subgroups of people with low back pain whose symptoms are associated with different direction related postures or movement patterns (e.g., flexion or extension related).
If multiple low back pain subgroups are studied as a single population, differences between subgroups demonstrating patterns in opposite directions could average out to suggest no difference in motion between people with and without low back pain. When subgrouping was not included in the study design, several studies found no differences in lumbar postural alignment and motion between people with and without low back pain. Still other studies found that decreased lumbar motion is associated with low back pain. Lumbar postural alignment and motion characteristics associated with low back pain may be more clearly identified when people with low back pain are subgrouped based on lumbar patterns associated with symptoms.
(more…)
Modic type I change may predict rapid progressive, deforming disc degeneration: a prospective 1-year follow-up study
From: Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan 17. [Epub ahead of print]
This prospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study in chronic low back pain patients evaluated the natural course of degenerative lumbar spine changes in relation to Modic 1 type changes within 1 year. From 3,811 consecutive chronic low back pain patients referred to lumbar spine MRI 54 patients with a large Modic 1 type changes were selected using strict exclusion criteria to exclude specific back disorders. Follow-up MRI was obtained within 11-18 months.
At baseline Modic 1 type changes was associated with an adjacent endplate lesion in 96% of the cases. In follow-up, an unstable Modic 1 type change was associated both with an increase of endplate lesions, decrease of disc height and change in disc signal intensity, most found at L4/5 or L5/S1. In disc spaces without Modic 1 type changes, progression of degenerative changes was rare. Endplate deformation, decreasing disc height and change of disc signal intensity appear essential features of accelerated degenerative process associated with Modic 1 type changes.
Does lumbar spinal degeneration begin with the anterior structures? A study of the observed epidemiology in a community-based population
From: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Sep 13;12:202
The importance of spine stability is a central paradigm in spine care. Maintenance of spine stability, through decreasing excessive or abnormal spinal movement, is the rationale for many commonly used treatments ranging from ‘lumbar stabilization’ rehabilitation to spinal fusion surgery. The spinal degenerative cascade is an important theory related to the concept of spine stability, and was originally popularized by Kirkaldy-Willis. Kirkaldy-Willis described a ‘cascade’ of degenerative changes affecting the three joint complex comprised of the intervertebral disc anteriorly and the lumbar zygapophyseal (‘facet’) joints posteriorly. This degenerative cascade consists of three sequential clinical stages: 1) dysfunction, 2) instability, and 3) stabilization. Kirkaldy-Willis described a mutual interrelationship of the intervertebral disc and facet joints, and pointed out that precipitating events in degeneration could begin not only with the intervertebral disc, but also with the facet joints.
Over time, however, the sequence of spinal degeneration has often been viewed from a more limited standpoint, with the perspective that anterior structure changes affecting the intervertebral disc largely precede- and lead to- posterior structure changes affecting the facet joints. The notion that degeneration begins with the intervertebral disc is described in textbooks of spine care and has been supported by some research studies. Vernon-Roberts conducted a landmark study of fewer than 100 cadaveric specimens that found that degenerative disc changes were always accompanied by facet joint degenerative changes. This study concluded that disc degeneration was the primary event leading to degenerative spondylosis. In an imaging study of 68 subjects with low back pain, Butler et al. also found that facet joint degeneration did not occur in the absence of disc degeneration, but disc degeneration frequently occurred without facet joint degeneration. Butler concluded that discs degenerate before facets. These conclusions were further supported by a recent cross-sectional MRI study of individuals with low back pain. Some authors, however, have questioned the view that disc degeneration necessarily precedes facet degeneration. A prior report notes that facet arthrosis on MRI precedes disc degeneration in 20% of men. Furthermore, in a large study of skeletal specimens (n = 647), Eubanks et al. found that facet joint osteoarthritis often preceded changes of disc degeneration in younger individuals.
(more…)
Ten-year survey reveals differences in GP management of neck and back pain
From: Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan 8. [Epub ahead of print]
Clinical guidelines provide similar recommendations for the management of new neck pain and low back pain but it is unclear if general practitioner’s (GP) care is similar. While GP’s management of low back pain is well documented, little is known about GP’s management of neck pain. We aimed to describe GP’s management of new neck pain and compare this to GP’s management of new low back pain in Australia between April 2000 and March 2010. All GP-patient encounters for a new (i.e. first visit to any medical practitioner) neck pain or low back pain problem were compared in terms of treatment delivered, referral patterns and requests for laboratory and imaging investigations.
General practitioners in Australia have managed new neck pain and low back pain problems at a rate of 3.1 and 5.8 per 1,000 GP-patient encounters, respectively. GP’s primarily utilised medications, in particular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to manage new neck and low back pain problems and referred approximately 25% of all patients for imaging. Patients with new neck pain are more frequently managed using physical treatments and were referred more often to allied health professionals and specialists. In comparison, patients with new low back pain were managed more frequently with medication, advice, provision of a sickness certificate and ordering of pathology tests.
This is the first time GP management of a new episode of neck pain has been documented using a nationally representative sample and it is also the first time that the management of back and neck pain has been compared. Despite guidelines endorsing a similar approach for the management of new neck pain and low back pain, in actual clinical practice Australian GPs manage these two conditions differently.
Prevalence, characteristics, and work-related risk factors of low back pain among hospital nurses in Taiwan: A cross-sectional survey
From: Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2012 Mar;25(1):41-50. Epub 2012 Jan 5
Low back pain is a common health problem among hospital nurses. However, the prevalence, characteristics, and work-related risk factors of low back pain have not been widely investigated in Taiwan.
This study used a cross-sectional survey of 217 hospital nurses to gather self-reported information on the prevalence of back pain, demographic and pain characteristics, and work-related risk factors from 178 respondents who indicated a past history of back pain. The association between the characteristics of back pain and work-related risk factors was also examined.
The lifetime prevalence of back pain was 82.03%, and the point prevalence of back pain was 43.78%. The mean pain score is 41.67. The number of years at work was significantly associated with the pain score for an individual’s most recent episode of back pain, the extent of bothersomeness of back pain and leg pain, and the extent to which back pain interfered with normal work.
Back pain is common among hospital nurses in Taiwan. Years at work are significantly associated with pain severity and disability caused by back pain.
The impact of back problems on retirement wealth
From: Pain. 2012 Jan;153(1):203-10
This study undertook an economic analysis of the costs of early retirement due to back problems, with the aim of quantifying how much lower the value of accumulated wealth of individuals who exit the workforce early due to back problems is by the time they reach the traditional retirement age of 65years – compared to those who remained in the workforce. This was done using the output dataset of the microsimulation model Health&WealthMOD.
It was found that over 99% of individuals who are employed full time will have accumulated some wealth at age 65 years, whereas as little as 74% of those who are out of the labour force due to back problems will have done so. Those who retire from the labour force early due to back problems will have a median value of total accumulated wealth by the time they are 65 of as little as $3708 (for women aged 55-64years). This is far lower than the median value of accumulated wealth for those women aged 55-64 years who remained in the labour force full time, who will have $214,432 of accumulated wealth at age 65 years.
Not only will early retirement due to back problems limit the immediate income available to individuals, but it will also reduce their long-term financial capacity by reducing their wealth accumulation. Maintaining the labour force participation of those with back problems, or preventing the onset of the disease, should be a priority in order to maintain living standards comparable with others who do not suffer from this condition.
Relative importance of expertise, lifting height and weight lifted on posture and lumbar external loading during a transfer task in manual material handling
From: Ergonomics. 2012 Jan;55(1):87-102
The objective of this study was to measure the effect size of three important factors in manual material handling, namely expertise, lifting height and weight lifted. The effect of expertise was evaluated by contrasting 15 expert and 15 novice handlers, the effect of the weight lifted with a 15-kg box and a 23-kg box and the effect of lifting height with two different box heights: ground level and a 32 cm height. The task consisted of transferring a series of boxes from a conveyor to a hand trolley.
Lifting height and weight lifted had more effect size than expertise on external back loading variables (moments) while expertise had low impact. On the other hand, expertise showed a significant effect of posture variables on the lumbar spine and knees. All three factors are important, but for a reduction of external back loading, the focus should be on the lifting height and weight lifted.
The objective was to measure the effect size of three important factors in a transfer of boxes from a conveyor to a hand trolley. Lifting height and weight lifted had more effect size than expertise on external back loading variables but expertise was a major determinant in back posture.
Lumbosacral facet syndrome: functional and organic disorders of lumbosacral facet joints
From: Lijec Vjesn. 2011 Sep-Oct;133(9-10):330-6
Disorders of lumbosacral facet joints are manifested by low back pain with or without referred leg pain and decreased mobility of the lumbosacral spine (lumbosacral facet syndrome). The most frequent causes of lumbosacral facet syndrome are functional disorders (functional blockade or dysfunction of facet joint=reversible restriction of facet joint movements caused by meniscoid entrapment) and degenerative changes of facet joints while the others are less frequent (spondyloarthropathies, infection, tuberculosis, synovial cyst, injury). Although it has been proven that the facet joints are one of the most frequent sources of chronic low back pain (15-45%), the fact is that the facet syndrome has been frequently overlooked in patients with chronic low back pain.
Following are the main reasons for explaining why the facet syndrome has been overlooked in patients with chronic low back pain:
1. Facet joints disorders are manifested by non-specific clinical picture.
2. Diagnosis of facet syndrome cannot be established by either the conventional clinical examination or radiological examinations.
3. A very small number of doctors are practicing manual functional examination which can establish the diagnosis of facet joint dysfunction.
4. Diagnostic anesthetic block which can confirm the facet syndrome diagnosis is not a widely accessible method.
There is a lack of research in frequency of facet syndrome in patients with acute low back pain. Chronic mechanical low back pain caused by dysfunction of several structurally unchanged facet joints can have the same features as the inflammatory pain which can result in misdiagnosis of spondyloarthropathy. Acute lumbosacral facet syndrome caused by dysfunction of facet joints responds very well to manual therapy. The most important therapeutic options in patients with chronic lumbosacral facet syndrome caused by degenerative changes and/or dysfunction of facet joints are manual therapy, kinesiotherapy (flexion exercises), therapeutic blocks and radiofrequency denervation. The article describes etiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, differential diagnosis and therapy of lumbosacral facet syndrome with emphasis on functional disorders of facet joints that can cause particular diagnostic and therapeutic problems.
