Neck Solutions Blog

April 10, 2009

Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery

Filed under: Arthritis,Neck Pain — Administrator @ 1:27 pm

Trends and Variations in Cervical Spine Surgery in the United States: Medicare Beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005

From: Spine. 2009 Apr 2. [Epub ahead of print]

Degenerative changes of the cervical spine are commonly diagnosed, and seen radiographically in over half of the population aged 55 years or greater. Previous studies have shown that rates of surgery for this condition increased 90% in the general adult US population from 1990 to 2000. Marked geographic variation has also been shown in the rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures in all adults, with the highest rates occurring in Southern United States.

In elderly patients, degenerative changes of the cervical spine are widespread. In addition, the overall US population is aging, with the most rapid increase in people 85 years and older. Prior studies, however, have not focused on the elderly population, even though an increase in the mean age and number of comorbid conditions has been noted in patients hospitalized for cervical spine surgery. Primary diagnosis and surgical procedure also varies by age, with elderly patients more commonly diagnosed with cervical spondylosis with myelopathy and treated by posterior or combined anterior and posterior procedures.

To better define recent population-based trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in elderly patients, the authors examined surgery for degenerative changes of the cervical spine in Medicare beneficiaries from 1992 to 2005.

Cervical spine fusions for degenerative changes of the cervical spine increased 206% from 1992 to 2005, among Medicare beneficiaries in the United States after adjustment for age, sex, and race. The increase in cervical spine fusions is similar to the 220% increase from 1990 to 2001 seen in lumbar fusion surgery in adults of all ages.

Among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing surgery for degenerative changes of the cervical spine, the most common primary diagnosis and procedure were cervical spondylosis with myelopathy and cervical fusion; of these, anterior fusions were the most common. Rates of anterior cervical discectomies with or without fusion were highest in the South.

It is interesting to speculate that an increase in rates of surgery for older adults might be driven in part by patient factors such as longer life expectancy or a demand for continued or improved function with increasing age. The role of patient expectations in this context is unknown.

Patient outcome and cost-effectiveness of treatment options are not clearly defined for degenerative changes of the cervical spine. Long-term outcome is also not well known and the natural history of cervical spondylosis is not clear. Some studies suggest that surgical intervention after neurologic decline is associated with worse outcome. Surgical decision-making for degenerative changes of the cervical spine thus remains a topic of debate. For patients with progressive neurologic deficits and degenerative changes of the cervical spine, there is general consensus that surgical treatment is the best option. However, surgical indications are less clear when patients do not have a progressive course. Some evidence suggests that patients with cervical spondylosis with myelopathy may plateau and remain symptomatically stable for a long time. However, other studies also suggest that once patients develop moderate symptoms, they may be less likely to improve even after surgery.

April 8, 2009

Head posture and neck pain of chronic nontraumatic origin

Filed under: Neck Pain,Posture — Administrator @ 8:14 pm

Head posture and neck pain of chronic nontraumatic origin: a comparison between patients and pain free persons

From: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Apr;90(4):669-74

To compare standing head posture measurements between patients with nontraumatic neck pain and pain free individuals ia a hospital and general community. Consecutive patients (n=40) with chronic nontraumatic neck pain and age and sex matched pain free participants. Three angular measurements: the angle between C7, the tragus of the ear, and the horizontal; the angle between the tragus of the ear, the eye, and the horizontal; and the angle between the inferior margins of the right and the left ear and the horizontal were calculated through the digitization of video images.

Neck pain patients were found to have a significantly smaller angle between C7, the tragus, and the horizontal, resulting in a more forward head posture than pain free participants. Dividing the population according to age into younger (50y) revealed an interaction, with a statistically significant difference in head posture for younger participants with neck pain compared with younger pain free participants but no difference for the older group. No other differences were found between patients and pain free participants. Younger patients with chronic nontraumatic neck pain were shown to have a more forward head posture in standing than matched pain free participants. However, the difference, although statistically significant, was perhaps too small to be clinically meaningful.

April 7, 2009

Return to work expectations and recovery in whiplash

Filed under: Neck Pain,Whiplash — Administrator @ 9:41 am

Does expecting mean achieving? The association between expecting to return to work and recovery in whiplash associated disorders: a population-based prospective cohort study.

From: Eur Spine J. 2009 Apr 3. [Epub ahead of print]

To determine the association between expectations to return to work and self-assessed recovery. Positive expectations predict better outcomes in many health conditions, but to date the relationship between expecting to return to work after traffic related whiplash associated disorders and actual recovery has not been reported. The authors assessed early expectations for return to work in a cohort of 2,335 individuals with traffic related whiplash injury to the neck. Using multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis they assessed the association between return to work expectations and self perceived recovery during the first year following the event. After adjusting for the effects of sociodemographic characteristics, initial pain and symptoms, post-crash mood, prior health status and collision related factors, those who expected to return to work reported global recovery 42% more quickly than those who did not have positive expectations. Knowledge of return to work expectation provides an important prognostic tool to clinicians for recovery.

It was noted in J Rheumatol. 2009 Feb 17, Recovery in whiplash associated disorders; After adjusting for the effect of sociodemographic characteristics, post-crash symptoms and pain, prior health status and collision related factors, those who expected to get better soon recovered over 3 times as quickly as those who expected that they would never get better. Findings were similar for resolution of pain related limitations and resolution of neck pain intensity.

Furthermore, in PLoS Medicine. 2008 May 13;5(5):e105, Expectations for Recovery Important in the Prognosis of Whiplash Injuries; There was a dose response relationship between recovery expectations and disability. After controlling for severity of physical and mental symptoms, individuals who stated that they were less likely to make a full recovery, were more likely to have a high disability compared to individuals who stated that they were very likely to make a full recovery from whiplash injuries. Individuals’ expectations for recovery are important in prognosis, even after controlling for symptom severity.

It is evident that clinicians should assess these expectations in order to identify those patients at risk of chronic whiplash and promote positive recovery expectations. This should be documented, especially in cases where there is financial gain associated with poor recovery for both clinician and patient.

April 2, 2009

Anatomy and biomechanics of whiplash injury

Filed under: Neck Pain,Whiplash — Administrator @ 11:17 am

The anatomy and biomechanics of acute and chronic whiplash injury

From: Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Apr;10(2):101-12

Whiplash injury is the most common motor vehicle injury, yet it is also one of the most poorly understood. Here the authors examine the evidence supporting an organic basis for acute and chronic whiplash injuries and review the anatomical sites within the neck that are potentially injured during these collisions. For each proposed anatomical site -facet joints, spinal ligaments, intervertebral discs, vertebral arteries, dorsal root ganglia, and neck muscles -they present the clinical evidence supporting that injury site, its relevant anatomy, the mechanism of and tolerance to injury, and the future research needed to determine whether that site is responsible for some whiplash injuries. This article serves as a snapshot of the current state of whiplash biomechanics research and provides a roadmap for future research to better understand and ultimately prevent whiplash injuries.

« Newer Posts

Powered by WordPress